Environmental researchers have weighed in on the ongoing debate on whether to remove shoes before entering the house. The chief environmental scientist for the Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Mark Patrick Taylor, and the executive director of the Environmental Resilience Institute, Gabriel Filippelli, penned a piece for The Conversation about the risk of bringing outdoor contaminants inside people’s homes via their shoes. The authors, who have studied indoor contaminants for a decade through their DustSafe program, suggest that based on their research findings, it is “best to leave your filth outside the door.” According to the scientists, a third of the contaminant build-up inside homes comes from outside, including what the wind and your shoes bring in. They warn that among the microorganisms shoes can carry in are drug-resistant pathogens and bacteria. Shoes can also bring in residue from asphalt roads and lawn chemicals associated with endocrine disruptions that may contain cancer-causing toxins. “Beyond the occasional stubbed toe, from an environmental health standpoint, there aren’t many downsides to having a shoe-free house,” the authors note. “Leaving your shoes at the entry mat also leaves potentially harmful pathogens there as well.” The scientists conclude that leaving shoes off at the door is a “basic and easy prevention activity for many of us.” They suggest having “indoor shoes” that are not worn outside if going barefoot is not an option. For those who are worried that an “overly sterile” home can lead to increased allergy risk and underdeveloped immune systems in children, the authors said, “enjoy the great outdoors.” While many Asian households maintain a strict shoes-off rule , sometimes opting for wearing slippers indoors, others have argued that imposing such restrictions on guests can be considered rude, sparking more online debate in recent months. The scientists also highlighted a recent piece published by the Wall Street Journal which tried to make an argument that wearing shoes inside other people’s homes is justified because the deadly E. coli bacteria is already widely spread. While the article is satire, the researchers still responded with reason, explaining that wearing the shoes would definitely exacerbate the risk of exposing residents to high levels of the bacteria. Feature Image via Jakob Owens

Enjoy this content? Read more from NextShark!

An award-winning photo of an elephant swimming has reignited a fierce debate on animal welfare in Thailand

Singaporean Student Invents 'Watermelon Gameboy' to Play 'Pokémon Emerald'

Singapore Airlines' most luxurious first-class suites are now available from the US — take a look inside

3 Ways to Stop Glasses From Fogging Up While Wearing a Mask

The Cape Wildlife Center found the angry cotton ball in a backyard in Wareham.

Since the release of Windows 10, Windows Defender has evolved into a more complex and comprehensive means of system protection.

When Netflix announced it lost 200,000 subscribers year-over-year, it was the first time the streaming service had a drop in subscribers in a decade, Forbes reported. See: 50 Ways You're Throwing...

Magic does exist — and it’s in the form of a brilliant $10 gadget. Shoe crease protectors are the perfect gift for the sneaker-head in your life, who wants to keep their kicks as smooth and crease-free as possible. Bonus points? The longer their shoes stay fresh, the longer you get to wait for another […]

Former president called the threat a ‘negotiation tactic’

"If I could give 10+ stars I would."

And they're ultra comfortable.

I've never considered myself a shoe girl, but being a shopping editor means adopting more shoes than my closet can fill (what a problem to have). Recently, Keds sent over its limited-edition Women's Renaissance Sneaker ($85), and I think I've met my shoe-mate (aka shoe soulmate).